Covalence Banking Sector 2010 report covers the progress in ethical reputation of the banking sector. The report analyses and compares the ethical reputation of 29 international banks, internally as well as against the 18 sectors benchmark covering 581 large companies.
Key Findings
The ethical reputation of banks shows a smaller progress than other sectors mainly due to a low volume of positive news regarding products, as well as criticisms related to remunerations and gender discriminations.
- The Impact of Product criteria group only represents 16% of positive news registered on banks, against 37% for the 18 sectors benchmark.
- Banks are shy in demonstrating the social utility of their products and in presenting their innovations in this field.
- Many banking activities can be described in terms of contribution to sustainable development but banks don’t use these terms much.
- The low level of criticisms targeting banks’ products can be interpreted as a lack of incentives.
- Secondly, bankers seem to consider that highlighting their sustainable products may be counterproductive to the serious, conservative, cautious, and money-oriented corporate culture and image they show to their clients.
- Next to the usual suspects (tax issues), wages was the most active criteria.
- CEO compensation, traders’ bonuses, and the differential between the highest and the lowest salaries within banks have been abundantly criticized.
- This report also highlights an increasing amount of negative comments about the status of women at work (discrimination on wages and promotions, a work atmosphere described as unfriendly to women).
- On the positive side, banks registered the most points on social sponsorship (philanthropic donations, community investments) and on climate change mitigation.
- Some banks are less shy than others in their offering of sustainable products, which allows them to score well in Covalence EthicalQuote Ranking.
- For example, they communicate on their involvement in microfinance and renewable energy projects, on interest rates favorable to green buildings, or on their signing of the UN Principles for Responsible Investment.
Author(s)
Covalence
UK retailer Marks & Spencer is stepping its plans to sell only items that have at least one “eco” or “ethical” attribute. By 2015, the retailer aims to have half its products meet that standard. By 2020, the goal is 100 percent.
Author(s):
Author


